Menu

SA029
Western columbine genetics across HJ Andrews Experimental Forest meadow communities

CREATOR(S): Andy Jones, Dustin Gannon
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR(S): Andy Jones
ORIGINATOR(S): Dustin Gannon
OTHER RESEARCHER(S): Matthew G Betts
DATA SET CONTACT PERSON: Dustin Gannon
DATA SET CREDIT:
U.S. National Science Foundation GRFP 1840998; Portland Garden Club Katherine R. Pamplin Fund; Leslie and Vera Gottlieb Research Fund in Plant Evolutionary Biology
MOST RECENT METADATA REVIEW DATE:
22 Jul 2019
KEYWORDS:
genetics, meadows
PURPOSE:
Assess the degree to which woody encroachment on montane meadow communities may disrupt plant-pollinator interactions and influence meadow plant population connectivity and viability.
METHODS:
Experimental Design - SA029:
Description:

We sampled western columbine leaves (Aquilegia formosa) from four major meadow complexes (spatial clusters of meadows) within the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon, USA: two complexes along Frissel Ridge (M1 and M2), one on Carpenter Mountain (CM), and one on Lookout Mountain (LOM). Meadows within complexes were selected based on a two-step approach. First, we focused on meadows from which we had hummingbird RFID data (see project SA028) and those from which we had A. formosa seed set and/or pollen flow data. Because we aim to test the degree to which contemporary hummingbird movement predicts plant population genetic structure, we sought to sample plants in locations that should best reflect movement estimates. Divergence between the two is therefore less likely to be caused simply by sampling different meadows with different conditions, and more likely related to the biology of gene flow among plants on the landscape.

We then calculated meadow area (m2) and connectivity based on the amount of forest in a 100m-radius buffer around the meadow centroid (meadows with high proportions of forest cells surrounding them were assumed less connected). We stratified meadows into four categories: large-connected, large-isolated, small-connected, and small-isolated meadows based on natural but arbitrary breaks in the distributions of meadow size and connectivity (breaks were placed at 3.2 log10(m2) and 63% forest cover for meadow size and connectivity, respectively). Meadows from which we had complementary data (RFID or seed set data) were categorized into respective strata. We then filled the list in by randomly sampling within strata up to 32 meadows such that the final list included at least two meadows belonging to each stratum (large-connected, large-isolated, small-connected, small-isolated) within each of the four meadow complexes (M1, M2, CM, LOM).

Field Methods - SA029:
Description: In many cases, A. formosa did not occupy randomly selected meadows. In such cases, we visited the next meadow belonging to the same stratum and meadow complex in a randomized list. Due to time constraints, we were unable to sample all complex-stratum combinations. The final list of focal meadows included 28 meadows, with at least one meadow from each stratum in each complex. From the 28 meadows, we sampled fresh leaves from a minimum of six A. formosa individuals, placed them in 4ml cryotubes, and stored them in a charged Worthington CXR500 dry-shipper (-1900C) until transport back to Oregon State University where they could be stored in a -800C freezer.
Data Entry - SA029:
Description: Sample data (sample location, ID, meadow, meadow complex, forest cover, and phenological stage) were entered by hand. Entries were checked and verified in a separate data entry session.
TAXONOMIC SYSTEM:
None
GEOGRAPHIC EXTENT:
Montane meadows within the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Western Cascades, Oregon, USA.
MEASUREMENT FREQUENCY:
One-time leaf sample collection
PROGRESS DESCRIPTION:
Complete
UPDATE FREQUENCY DESCRIPTION:
notPlanned
CURRENTNESS REFERENCE:
Ground condition