Menu

MS001
Meteorological data from benchmark stations at the HJ Andrews Experimental Forest, 1957 to present

CREATOR(S): Christopher Daly, Mark D Schulze, W. Arthur McKee
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR(S): Mark D Schulze, Christopher Daly
ORIGINATOR(S): W. Arthur McKee
OTHER RESEARCHER(S): Mark D Schulze, Sherri L. Johnson, Julia A. Jones, Adam M Kennedy, Stephanie A Schmidt, Greg M Cohn
DATA SET CONTACT PERSON: Adam M Kennedy, Stephanie A Schmidt
ABSTRACTOR: Donald L. Henshaw, Suzanne M. Remillard
METHOD CONTACT: Greg Downing, Greg M Cohn
FORMER INVESTIGATOR: Richard H. Waring, David Greenland, Mark E. Harmon, Don Henshaw, Craig Creel, Frederick A. Bierlmaier, John Moreau, Christoph K Thomas, Michael H. Unsworth, Anne W. Nolin, Adam B. Mazurkiewicz, Alfred B. Levno, Roswell C. Mersereau, Fox Sparky Peterson
METADATA CREATION DATE:
15 Oct 2003
MOST RECENT METADATA REVIEW DATE:
1 Jul 2024
KEYWORDS:
Organic matter, hydrology, meteorology, climatology, climate change, atmospheric pressure, vapor pressure, relative humidity, precipitation, snow accumulation, wind direction, wind speed, snow, air temperature, soil temperature, photosynthetically active radiation, solar radiation, soil moisture, disturbance, monitoring
PURPOSE:
Hydrology, climatology, and biology interact over a wide range of spatial and temporal scales. Continuous interaction among climate, soils, landuse, and vegetation shape the hydrology and ecology of a landscape. Long-term measurements of such variables at various time and space scales provide an essential foundation for understanding ecosystem processes, and document changes in the local, regional, and global environments.
METHODS:
Experimental Design - MS001:
Description:

Much of the early climatological measurements on the Andrews Forest were associated with the investigation of the initial small watersheds experiment (Watersheds 1, 2, 3). The Climatic Station on WS 2 was installed in 1956 to measure precipitation and a hygrothermograph was added in 1958. The High-15 station was established to measure precipitation in 1964 in conjunction with small watersheds 6, 7, 8, and has evolved into a secondary meteorological station. A more general set of modeling needs led to the installation of the Primary Meteorological Station in 1972 to characterize the meso-scale environment. Originally, solar radiation, air temperature, dew point temperature, and windspeed were collected. Along with precipitation from the climatic station on WS 2, these were the primary climatic variables needed for the models predicting the rates at which materials accumulate or move through ecosystems (Waring et al., 1978). Significant improvements to the station were made in 1975, 1979, and 1988, as the station evolved from chart recorders to state-of-the-art digital data loggers (Bierlmaier and McKee, 1989). The Vanilla Leaf Met Station was installed in 1987. The primary intent was to provide micro- meteorological data for a study of seedling survival following clearcut and shelterwood logging at high elevation. Ultimately, the shelterwood site was discontinued and the clearcut site has evolved as a primary high elevation meteorological station.

Four Benchmark Meteorological Stations (BMS) and two second-level stations are included in the MS001 database. The Primary Meteorological and Vanilla Leaf Meteorological BMS are retained. Two new BMS are installed. In 1994, the Upper Lookout Meteorological Station was established at high elevation (4200 ft, ENE aspect) on clearcut L708 in the SE Andrews. In 1995 the Central Meteorological BMS was established at a centrally located site on clearcut L351 (3300 ft, WSW aspect) in the east-central Andrews. A GIS analysis of elevation and aspect indicated the average elevation (3170 ft., 966 m) and average aspect (267 degrees) of the Andrews Forest, and the Central Met Station was located to represent these general averages. Modifications are made to the Primary and Vanilla Leaf Stations to standardize measured variables, temporal resolution, methods, and instrumention across all BMS. Sites will be cleared and required openings maintained following standards of the National Weather Service, the LTER network, and where appropriate, the NADP network. Telemetering of all BMS was completed in 1996. Second-level stations (SLS) at the Hi-15 and WS 2 Climatic Station will continue to be maintained for measurement of precipitation, temperature, and other data to maintain continuity of historical records. These sites also follow established procedural standards.

The BMS include meteorological measurement of air and soil temperature, relative humidity, calculated dew point temperature and vapor pressure deficit, wind speed and direction measurement, incoming solar radiation, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), soil moisture, snow melt, and snow moisture and depth.

Citation: The Program for Hydroclimatological Measurement at the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest by Don Henshaw, Arthur McKee, Alok Sikka 18 Aug 1995 http://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/research/component/climate/clim95.pdf
Field Methods - MS001: Air temperature:
Description:

The follow link describes data collection methods (by date range and resolution) that have been used by each unique probe. Results are filtered by database code, sitecode, parameter, and probe.

https://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/MethodCode/View_History.aspx

Please follow this link to view climate data collection methods that have been used over time at select stations. Results can be filtered by parameter, climate station, and date range. A general text search is also available.

https://hjandrews.shinyapps.io/im_methods_history/

Temperature data has been measured with a variety of instruments:

  • Thermocouple wire: Probe is type T thermocouple soldered from thermocouple wire
  • Campbell Scientific thermistor probe: Campbell Scientific model 107 temperature probe (CS107B, CS107B-L) includes the Fenwal Electronics UUT51J1 thermistor
  • Vaisala Relative Humidity/Temperature probes: Temperature and relative humidity are sampled by a Campbell Model HMP35C or the HMP45C probe containing a Vaisala capacitive relative humidity sensor and a Fenwal Electronics UUT51J1 thermistor

Probes were housed in locally designed PVC radiation shields from the 1980s until the mid 2000s. Gill radiation shields replaced the PVC shields at all of the benchmark sites after a significant concurrent comparison was made. Aspirated shields are also now in use. The original 1.5 meter Primary Met Station sensor was housed in a Cotton Region Shelter. Historical methods included Rustrak strip charts with thermister where air temperature is measured by a Yellow Springs Instruments linear thermistor in a standard Cotton Region Shelter and continuously recorded on a separate 30-day Rustrak strip chart scaled from -10 degrees C to 40 degrees C.

Data loggers are typically Campbell Scientific (CR10, CR21X, CR500, or CR23X). Early data loggers used in the 1980s are Interface Instrument models M-2, M-3, and M-4.

Instrumentation: Thermocouple wire; Campbell Scientific model 107 temperature probe (CS107B, CS107B-L) includes the Fenwal Electronics UUT51J1 thermistor; Campbell Model HMP35C or the HMP45C probe containing a Vaisala capacitive relative humidity sensor and a Fenwal Electronics UUT51J1 thermistor; Campbell Scientific data loggers (CR10, CR21X, CR500, or CR23X); Interface Instrument models M-2, M-3, and M-4
Field Methods - MS001: Dew point temperature:
Description:

The follow link describes data collection methods (by date range and resolution) that have been used by each unique probe. Results are filtered by database code, sitecode, parameter, and probe.

https://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/MethodCode/View_History.aspx

Please follow this link to view climate data collection methods that have been used over time at select stations. Results can be filtered by parameter, climate station, and date range. A general text search is also available.

https://hjandrews.shinyapps.io/im_methods_history/

Dew Point is calculated from air temperature and relative humidity every sampling interval (generally every 15 seconds) and output hourly using Tetens Equation for the relation between temperature and the partial pressure of water vapor (see http://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/data/studies/ms01/dewpt_vpd_calculations.pdf). This is calculated for independent pairs of air temperature and relative humidity probes at 150 and 450 cm heights for all benchmark stations (except CS2MET which only has sensors at 150 cm height).

Historical methods at PRIMET used a heated lithium-chloride dew point sensor with a thermistor that recorded continuously on a separate 30-day Rustrak strip chart throughout the 1970s. An Interface Instrument hygrometer with linear thermister was used to measure dew point indirectly with a heated Interface Instrument lithium-chloride hygrometer with a linear thermistor from 1979 until 1988. The PRIMET early dew point sensors and subsequent air temperature and relative humidity sensors used to calculate dew point were located in the 150 cm height cotton shelter until May 2000. The cotton shelter was discontinued for dew point calculation and replaced with use of the 450 cm probe on the PRIMET tower.

Instrumentation: Early instrumentation at PRIMET in the 1970s included a heated lithium-chloride dew point sensor. The sensor temperature is measured with a thermistor and recorded continuously on a separate 30-day Rustrak strip chart scaled from -5 degrees C to 20 degrees C with and with an accuracy and resolution of 1 degree C. The Interface Instrument M-2 or M-3 data logger was used. This sensor was often very unreliable. In the 1980s, dew point temperature is measured indirectly by a heated Interface Instrument lithium-chloride hygrometer with a linear thermistor. The accuracy is +/-0.5 degrees C with a resolution of 0.1 degrees C, and range of -14 to 29 degrees C. The Interface Instruments M-4 data logger was used. All other dew point measurements have been calculated from air temperature and relative humidity sensors.
Field Methods - MS004: Precipitation :
Description:

The follow link describes data collection methods (by date range and resolution) that have been used by each unique probe. Results are filtered by database code, sitecode, parameter, and probe.

https://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/MethodCode/View_History.aspx

Please follow this link to view climate data collection methods that have been used over time at select stations. Results can be filtered by parameter, climate station, and date range. A general text search is also available.

https://hjandrews.shinyapps.io/im_methods_history/

Precipitation records are generally evaluated every 5 minutes and data points are output to capture 5 minute resolution. In actuality, not all of the gauges are designed for accurate recording at this high temporal frequency except during periods of high intensity rain/snowfall. This is generally due to the sensitivity of the magnetostrictive tank gauge and associated tank diameter in measuring fluid level. The "stand-alone" gauges at UPLMET, VANMET and CENMET are designed for greater sensitivity to changes in tank depth and the 5 minute output is good during most precipitation events. The "shelter gauges" at those sites are not as sensitive to a change in fluid depth. The tipping bucket gauge at PRIMET reliably outputs tips on a 5 minute basis, although this record is somewhat artificial at 5 minute resolution, especially in light rain situations where the gage does not tip in every 5 minute segment and 15 minute resolution is probably more realistic. Early chart data at CS2MET and the H15MET have been digitized and are generally accurate at 15 minutes resolution.

The longest continuous precipitation record on the Andrews is at the Climatic Station on Watershed 2 (CS2MET): 1957-10-01 to Present. Data is collected weekly from a standard US Weather Bureau standard 8” rain gauge and an adjacent Universal recording gauge (chart). The weekly charts were originally hand digitized on a daily basis, and adjusted to the standard gauge total. Subsequently, all charts have been electronically digitized, and data can be reliably output at a 15 minute resolution. This high resolution chart data has also been corrected to the standard gage total on a weekly basis. This Universal rain gauge was originally positioned at another location on the Andrews (at FORKS) and that record can be used to extend the daily CS2MET precipitation record back to December, 1951. A ETI Instruments NOAH IV gauge was installed in 2011 and runs concurrently with the Universal gauge and the standard gauge

At the Hi-15 Meteorological Station (H15MET), a standard rain gauge has always been maintained along with an accompanying recording rain gauge. Historically, the charts were hand digitized on a daily basis, and the daily record corrected to the standard gauge periodic total using a prorating technique. Beginning in 1992 a more reliable recording gauge was installed using a pressure transducer to measure fluid depth, and this record is available with no correction to the standard gauge, although the standard gauge is still operational.

At both the Upper Lookout (UPLMET) and Central (CENMET) Stations, two gauges are in operation: a stand-alone gauge with two concentric, encircling wind fences, and a second gauge atop the station shelter. The orifice of the stand alone gauge is heated by a thermistatically-controlled propane heater. This heated gauge with the shielding fences has dramatically improved our precipitation catch, particularly in heavy snow conditions, and has prevented snow bridging over the gauge orifice. The shelter gauge is located on top of our station shelter and heated through ducts from the shelter's propane heating system. This gauge has also improved catch over the more traditionally heated rain gauges, but is protected only with an alter wind shield and catches less than the stand-alone.

At Vanilla Leaf (VANMET) the original gauge in the clearcut was installed in 1987 but the record is discontinued in 1996. This gauge suffered from its openly exposed siting in this high elevation clearcut. Heavy snow and inadequate wind shielding were major problems. A stand-alone type gauge similar in design to those used at UPLMET and CENMET was installed in the adjacent and naturally sheltered meadow above the VANMET clearcut in 1998. This site takes advantage of the naturally-protected meadow and the wind fences are not employed here.

Instrumentation: Stand-alone rain gauges with Valdais-type concentric wind fencing are designed for use at remote Andrews locations in heavy snow conditions. The stand-alone gauges are constructed in two sections: 1) a heated orifice section 2) an unheated stand pipe section, and are designed to work with Campbell Scientific data loggers. The two concentric, encircling wind fences are used at CENMET and UPLMET (see design description http://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/data/studies/ms01/stand_alone_raingage_design.pdf). Shelter-top rain gauges are currently in use at CENMET, UPLMET, and H15MET. The shelter-top gauge sits on top of a shelter and is heated using ducted shelter heat from the shelter propane heater controlled by the datalogger and thermistor. Continuous precipitation is measured by recorded tank depth measurements (magnetostrictve tank gauges or pressure transducer) in association with Campbell Scientific data loggers. Stevens A-35 chart recorders were used at some sites as a precipitation record backup. Wind Alter shields are typically employed. The Climatic Station at WS#2 (CS2MET) employs a Belfort Universal Recording Rain Gage, Cat No. 5-780 Series. 8" diameter, 12" capacity, and accuracy of .33%. The record is corrected to a nearby 8" US Weather Service Standard Raingage. An ETI Instruments Noah IV gauge was installed in 2011. The Primary Met Station employs a Texas Electronics tipping bucket gauge with 8" diameter orifice with data logger located on a 1 meter high platform with a Campbell Scientific data logger.
Field Methods - MS001: Relative humidity:
Description:

The follow link describes data collection methods (by date range and resolution) that have been used by each unique probe. Results are filtered by database code, sitecode, parameter, and probe.

https://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/MethodCode/View_History.aspx

Please follow this link to view climate data collection methods that have been used over time at select stations. Results can be filtered by parameter, climate station, and date range. A general text search is also available.

https://hjandrews.shinyapps.io/im_methods_history/

Generally, relative humidity is output hourly and is measured at heights of both 150 and 450 cm at these benchmark stations using Vaisala sensors with Campbell data loggers. Early records at CS2MET employed a hygrothermograph sensor to record daily max-min relative humidity from within a Cotton Region shelter on a recording chart from 1958 to 1998. Standard maximum and minimum thermometers on a Townsend support and a sling psychrometer were used to make weekly corrections to the hygrothermograph chart readings.

Instrumentation: Temperature and relative humidity are sampled by Campbell Model HMP35C or HMP45C probes containing a Vaisala capacitive relative humidity sensor and a Fenwal Electronics UUT51J1 thermistor. The probes were originally housed in a locally-designed PVC radiation shield, which were later replaced with Gill radiation shields. Campbell Scientific data loggers are used. The original 1.5 meter Primary Met Station sensor was housed in a Cotton Region Shelter. Historical instrumentation include the the Weather Measure Hi-Q hygrothermograph (http://www.novalynx.com/225-5020.html), a precision, self-contained recording instrument that measures and records ambient temperature and relative humidity simultaneously on a double scale chart. A specially treated bundle of human hair is used to measure relative humidity over the full range of 0 to 100%. The hair expands and contracts with increasing or decreasing amounts of water vapor in the air. The chart is installed on a self-contained brass clock which is spring-wound with accuracy of +/- 1%. A Belfort hygrothermograph had been used previously in the late 1950s and 1960s. The Belfort Maximum Minimum Thermometer Cat No. 5-484 indicates the temperature extremes reached over a 24 hour period and is the standard for correcting chart temperature readings.
Field Methods - MS007: Snow lysimeter :
Description:

The follow link describes data collection methods (by date range and resolution) that have been used by each unique probe. Results are filtered by database code, sitecode, parameter, and probe.

https://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/MethodCode/View_History.aspx

Please follow this link to view climate data collection methods that have been used over time at select stations. Results can be filtered by parameter, climate station, and date range. A general text search is also available.

https://hjandrews.shinyapps.io/im_methods_history/

Precipitation and melting snow runoff are measured by a tipping bucket with tips summarized in 5 minute intervals. General installation: The lysmeter collection pan was constructed from 2 x 12s and plywood. The pan was covered with hyplon (white vinyl polymer), and a bathtub drain installed in one corner. The pan was installed on the ground surface and was leveled such that the collected water would flow to the corner with the drain. The water is then directed to a tipping bucket (TB) in the basement of the structure by pvc pipe which is buried to prevent freezing. The final deminsions of the lysimeter pan are 92" x 93" x 12", so a volume of water equal to .01" of ppt is 1.4032 L.

Instrumentation: The Campbell data logger records the Tipping Bucket snow lysimeter tips (.01" of ppt/snowmelt input). An electromagnetic counter acts as a check to recorded tips. Sensors are connected to the data logger through a Campbell wiring panel.
Field Methods - MS007: Snow moisture and depth :
Description:

The follow link describes data collection methods (by date range and resolution) that have been used by each unique probe. Results are filtered by database code, sitecode, parameter, and probe.

https://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/MethodCode/View_History.aspx

Please follow this link to view climate data collection methods that have been used over time at select stations. Results can be filtered by parameter, climate station, and date range. A general text search is also available.

https://hjandrews.shinyapps.io/im_methods_history/

Snow water equivalence (SWE) and snow depth are measured every 5 minutes. Due to high variability in readings, particularly of snow depth, values may only be posted every hour for some data. Snow moisture is measured with a Park Mechanical pressure pillow and Druck pressure transducer. Snow depth is measured with a Campbell Scientific model SR50 sonic ranging snow depth sensor or Judd communications snow depth sensor. The snow depth sensor takes up to 10 readings, performs error checking and outputs a reading in mm every 5 minutes. Depth sensor measurement range is 0.5 to 10 meters. The snow sensor is mounted on a long pipe extending from the shelter. The snow pillow readings are instantaneous at 5 minute intervals. Campbell Scientific data logger is used. Snow moisture and snow depth are merged in the output files.

Instrumentation: Snow moisture is measured with a Park Mechanical pressure pillow and Druck pressure trandsducer. Snow depth is measured with a Campbell Scientific model SR50 sonic ranging snow depth sensor or Judd communications snow depth sensor. Campbell Scientific data loggers are used.
Field Methods - MS007: Snow course :
Description:

Snow moisture and snow depth are measured with snow cores at 5 points across a transect (see entity 20). This station snow course (transect) is near the station and tries to follow a single contour. The average of these 5 points provides a check of the snow pillow and snow depth sensor. Snow depth is also measured at each corner of the station snow pillow using a permanently set graduated stake (pvc pipe). The average depth is converted to snow water equivalence using the density calculated from the station snow course.

Instrumentation: Mt Rose snow core sampler
Field Methods - MS001: Watervapor pressure deficit:
Description:

The follow link describes data collection methods (by date range and resolution) that have been used by each unique probe. Results are filtered by database code, sitecode, parameter, and probe.

https://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/MethodCode/View_History.aspx

Please follow this link to view climate data collection methods that have been used over time at select stations. Results can be filtered by parameter, climate station, and date range. A general text search is also available.

https://hjandrews.shinyapps.io/im_methods_history/

Vapor pressure deficit values are calculated and output hourly from air temperature and relative humidity probes that sample every 15 seconds. Values are output in millibars and are collected at 150 and 450 cm heights at each of the four benchmark stations (PRIMET, CENMET, UPLMET, VANMET). The earliest hourly calculations were started at PRIMET in 1988 from air temperature and relative humidity sensors located in the 150 cm cotton shelter based on sampling every 15 seconds (in millibars). Please see the following for calculation details: http://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/data/studies/ms01/dewpt_vpd_calculations.pdf

Instrumentation: Water vapor pressure deficit is computed from relative humidity and air temperature every 15 second sampling interval and output hourly.
Models/Algorithms - MS001 :
Description:

Dewpoint and vapor pressure deficit equations can be found at:

http://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/data/studies/ms01/dewpt_vpd_calculations.pdf

Processing Procedures - MS001 :
Description: Sensor data streams via wifi into files at the headquarters. The files are run through GCE Data Toolbox, which is a comprehensive software framework for metadata-based analysis, quality control, transformation and management of ecological data sets. https://gce-lter.marsci.uga.edu/public/im/tools/data_toolbox.htm. The files are provided on the provisional data page. For processing into final formats, these files are processed through a Python script called Fastbridge where data visualization is possible and QC/QA validation and report logs occur. Data ranges are checked, specific statistical analysis are performed, data are transformed into final FSDB format.
Citation: Sheldon, Wade M. 2002. GCE Data Toolbox for MATLAB. Georgia Coastal Ecosystems LTER, University of Georgia, Athens.
Processing Procedure - MS001: Early PRIMET data :
Description:

A description of the early processing history and instrumentation for the Primary Meteorological Station (PRIMET), 1972-1989, is posted here:

http://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/data/studies/ms01/ms001_primet_1972_1989.pdf

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
NSF grants: DEB-7611978, DEB-8012162, DEB-8514325, DEB-9011663, DEB-9632921, DEB-0218088, DEB-0823380, DEB-1440409
SITE DESCRIPTION:
Temperature and rainfall in the Andrews Experimental Forest are are typical of a maritime climate with wet, relatively mild winters and dry, cool summers. Humidity is generally high through winter months, and maximum daily relative humidity approaches 100 percent at night throughout the year. Minimum summer humidities generally hover around 30-50 percent. Temperature extremes range from near 0 degrees F in unusually cold winters to over 100 degrees for brief periods almost every summer. The range in mean annual temperature (1972-2002) is 7.1-10.5 degrees C at a low elevation site (PRIMET). Precipitation varies with elevation - long-term annual average at low elevation (450 m) is 2200 mm, and at high elevation (1200m) is 2600 mm.
TAXONOMIC SYSTEM:
None
GEOGRAPHIC EXTENT:
H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest
ELEVATION_MINIMUM (meters):
436
ELEVATION_MAXIMUM (meters):
1300
MEASUREMENT FREQUENCY:
continuous
PROGRESS DESCRIPTION:
Active
UPDATE FREQUENCY DESCRIPTION:
annually
CURRENTNESS REFERENCE:
Ground condition